Course objectives
Communication is inherent to human organization and essential to its success. Successful completion of this course enables one to:
-
recall, compare, and give examples of key concepts and theories of organizational communication;
-
ask complex questions about organizational communication and have a sense of how one might answer those questions;
-
analyze and make recommendations from case studies;
-
successfully practice communication skills via class discussion and activities, writing, and student collaboration.
Policy
Active learning and the Web
“I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.” – Confucius
This is an active
learning
course meaning that you will be engaged with activities such as class and group discussion, participating in and designing class exercises, collaborative note-taking, and peer assessment. An implication of this is, for example, if you do not volunteer
at least one good comment or question
during a class, I might “cold call” you myself.
I also make much use of the Web. For instance, this syllabus is a Web page and I expect you to follow links.
Academic policies
In short, come to class on time and with the readings and assignments completed; be respectful and willing to collaborate. There are no provisions for missed exams or late assignments. If I notice you texting, then you are doing it too much. If I think your use of a computer is distracting you and others, I will put you on the spot (e.g., ask you to immediately send me your notes). Such deviations from classroom professionalism and respect may result in dismissal from class and demerits against your grade. See
full course policies
for more detail.
In general, if you have an issue, such as needing an accommodation for a religious obligation or learning disability, speak with me before it affects your performance; afterward it is too late. Do not ask for favors; instead, offer proposals that show initiative and a willingness to work.
Academic Integrity
: “The promotion of independent and original scholarship ensures that students derive the most from their educational experience and their pursuit of knowledge.” Violations include cheating, fabrication, plagiarism, and participating in or encouraging dishonesty. I will and have reported violators to the Office of Student Conduct.
Assignments
-
(20 pts) Class
participation
.
-
(20 pts) Reading responses. For every session for which there is a reading you will write and submit a
reading response
unless you take a freebie. Absent a specific prompt, summarize and engage. You should compose and keep these in a
response file
so that you can spell and grammar check your writing, and have your responses as a resource for your assignments. I will assess your response file twice a semester. You are permitted five freebies over the course of the semester, two in the first half and two in the second. Responses that were not submitted by the due date, including freebies, must be documented as such in the response file.
Responses are due 90 minutes prior to class. Responses must be emailed to me (j.reagle) with a subject prefix of
oc-r:
followed by a descriptive subject. Use simple plaintext (you can use
markdown conventions
), no attachments. If you fail to do this, I may not see the email and you could fail to get credit. Responses are
viewable
by other students via the Web.
-
(05 pts) Exam 1 Prototype and Study Guide
Work with your (instructor assigned) group to prepare an exam prototype and study guide.
The exam prototype must have at least ten multiple-choice or fill-in-the-blank questions, two short answer questions, and one short essay question. Each question must be followed by a short mnemonic, explanation, and/or example.
Groups must (roughly) follow the “Project or Work Groups” meeting model from chapter 8 of
The Zen of Groups
. As an appendix to your guide, include a single page record of your meetings (p. 72). That is, when, who (and roles), agenda items, decisions, and what (if any) techniques you used from the toolkit. You will reflect more substantively on this experience in the Experiential Analysis below.
-
(15 pts) Exam 1
-
(10 pts) Experiential Analysis
Write a ~1000 word
essay
reflecting on organizational experiences you’ve had – if you can, focus on experiences this class, including those of your study guide group.
-
(15 pts) Exam 2
-
(15 pts) Case analysis
Write a ~1000 word
essay
analyzing organizational issues presented in the film
Office Space (1999)
(or student proposed movie).
-
TRACE Our college requires all students to complete TRACE evaluations at the end of the semester. You will be asked to provide a screen shot to your instructor that reflects your participation, even if you (anonymously) opt-out of completing the survey.
Writing requirements (for assignments >= 500 words)
Written assignments must be double-spaced, 12 point font, 1-inch margins. One page should contain approximately 250 words. Pages must be numbered and stapled together. Citations must be in the APA style.
So as to avoid bias, I read assignments “blind” without knowing the author. Hence, your name (and final word count absent bibliography) should only appear on the back side of the final page. (That is, I should only know your name by turning the assignment over.) Consequently, include the
assignment appendix
as the final page.
All assignments must be reviewed by two peers and assessed according to the
writing rubric
. Make use of Hacker’s
Pocket Manual
and my
writing tips handout
. If you fail to give a peer a draft in time for review; or if they fail to give you a review, document it on the assignment appendix.
On the due date, print copies must be submitted in class and the electronic version must be submitted to BlackBoard Turnitin. The Turnitin version need not include the assignment appendix.
If
you have permission to revise a written assignment for re-assessment, please see these
revision instructions
.
Grading Rubric
“A” students have
all
of the following attributes, they:
-
show
mastery
in assignments. Their work demonstrates impressive understanding of readings, discussions, themes and ideas. It is fluid, clear, analytical, well-organized and grammatically polished. Reasoning and logic are well-grounded and examples precise.
-
have virtually perfect
attendance
. Their commitment to the class resembles that of the teacher.
-
are
prepared
for class. They always read assignments and participate fully. Their attention to detail is such that they occasionally catch the teacher in a mistake.
-
show
interest
in the class. They look up or dig out what they don’t understand. They often ask interesting questions or make thoughtful comments.
-
have
retentive
minds. They are able to connect past learning with the present.
-
have a winning
attitude
. They have the determination, initiative and self-discipline to succeed.
Please see the complete
rubric
for more, including specific rubrics for writing and participation.
Resources
Being a good student is a learned skill and craft.
“Best practices”
are guides to help you learn those skills and include: The Craft of Reading; Making Sense of Concepts; Achieving Balance in Discussion; Some Thoughts on Presenting; Writing Class Essays; and Feedback on Writing: Rubric and Writing.
I provide partial slide
handouts
for some of my classes. These classes will often contain active class
exercises
.
This class has an
email list
associated with it to which we can all send and receive messages.
Northeastern resources
Readings
Most readings are freely available online or on Blackboard. However, you must acquire the following:
-
James Surowiecki (2004),
The Wisdom of Crowds
.
-
Dale Hunter, Anne Bailey, Bill Taylor (1995),
The Zen of Groups: A Handbook for People Meeting with a Purpose
.
-
Diane Hacker (2011),
A Pocket Style Manual
.
A
reading calendar
is available.
Note the chapter (ch=) or pages (pp=) to read.
Bibliography
Like other skills,
bibliography
is something you learn to do well. Technology can make it easier. NU makes both RefWorks and EndNote
available
to students; you can also use the freely available browser-based
Zotero
. You can then import the
bibTeX file
of this class’s readings into those applications.
-
Readings
-
Classes
-
Sep 06 Fri
-
Come to class with mnemonic linking your name with something novel about yourself. For instance, I like science fiction: "Joseph the Jedi".
-
Mind Tools
-
Sep 10 Tue
-
Speak to one or more of the "Thinking Points" that occur within the chapters.
-
Dale Hunter, Anne Bailey, Bill Taylor
-
The Zen of Groups
-
ch=1-5 d=1995 p=Fisher a=Tucson, AZ
-
Sep 13 Fri
-
Identify something that you think is powerful/useful in Hofstede's work, and something that is less so. Justify your answer.
-
Geert Hofstede
-
Sep 17 Tue
-
Speak to one or more of the "Thinking Points" that occur within the chapters.
-
Dale Hunter, Anne Bailey, Bill Taylor
-
The Zen of Groups
-
ch=6-9 d=1995 p=Fisher a=Tucson, AZ
-
Sep 20 Fri
-
Naresh Khatri
-
Consequences of power distance orientation in organisations
-
j=Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective y=2009 v=13 n=1 doi=10.1177/097226290901300101
-
Sep 24 Tue
-
Ask a synthesis or evaluation question from Bloom's taxonomy about the reading. Then reflect on that question, perhaps by discussing how you would answer it. For instance, an example evaluation question would be: "how would you decide if a situation was
amendable to the 'wisdom of crowd'?"
-
Questions - Taxonomy
-
James Surowiecki
-
The wisdom of crowds
-
ch=1 bt=The Wisdom of Crowds d=2004 p=Doubleday a=New York
-
The difference difference makes
-
ch=2 bt=The Wisdom of Crowds d=2004 p=Doubleday a=New York
-
Sep 27 Fri
-
Read about the categories of scientific management, human behavior, and integrated theories. In your response identify and explain two theories: one you find most and least compelling. Also, come to class with a mnemonic for a theory.
-
Pamela Shockley-Zalabak
-
Oct 01 Tue
-
In your response, provide two good multiple choice questions for each of Shockley-Zalabak's three main categories (6 total). If it helps, use Enock to complement what we've already read with respect to the advantages and disadvantages of the theories -- you need not worry about new theories Enock discusses. (Also, no need to "summarize and engage.")
-
Questions - Multiple Choice
-
supplementary
-
Oct 04 Fri
-
James Surowiecki
-
Committees, juries, and teams
-
ch=9 bt=The Wisdom of Crowds d=2004 p=Doubleday a=New York
-
The company
-
ch=10 bt=The Wisdom of Crowds d=2004 p=Doubleday a=New York
-
Oct 08 Tue
-
Describe an organization with which you are familiar and identify instances of the three levels of culture.
-
Edgar H. Schein
-
Organizational culture: levels and cases
-
ch=1-3 d=2010 p=Jossey-Bass Publishers ed=4 a=Hoboken
-
Oct 11 Fri
-
Summarize and engage
-
Erick M. Eisenberg, H. L. Goodall, Angela Trethewey
-
Identity and difference in organizational life
-
ch=6 bt=Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint a=New York p=Bedford/St. Martin’s Press y=2010 ed=6
-
Oct 15 Tue
-
Exam Review
-
Due: Reading responses file
-
Oct 18 Fri
-
Oct 22 Tue
-
Pick a famous person and make a claim as to what types of power they exercise and if they do so effectively.
-
Fred C. Lunenburg
-
Oct 25 Fri
-
Identify primary and secondary mechanisms through which Steve Jobs shaped Apple's culture. Feel free to include Jobs/Apple examples from outside of the Guglielmo reading.
-
Edgar H. Schein
-
Organizational culture and leadership
-
ch=14 d=2010 p=Jossey-Bass Publishers ed=4 a=Hoboken
-
Connie Guglielmo
-
Oct 29 Tue
-
Find a picture of an office environment and speak to how you think it affects organizational communication. That is, what are the merits and demerits and is this a space you have or would want to work in?
-
Include a
markdown link to the image
on a separate line, i.e.: 
-
Annie Murphy Paul
-
John Tierney
-
Stephen Searer
-
Nov 01 Fri
-
We have two interesting but challenging readings. Try to extract their import before reading them more carefully. See if you can answer the following questions from purposeful skimming; that is, look at the abstract, conclusion, headings, first sentence of paragraphs and figures for clues before a more careful reading.
-
Dunbar states that human gossip has emerged/evolved from something else. What and why? Dunbar argues that gossip among humans serves a particular purpose. What is it?
-
Kurland and Pelled posit a relationship between two concepts: what are they and how are they defined? What is the nature of that relationship? (Is there a diagram or figure that clues you in?)
-
Robin Dunbar
-
Nancy B Kurland, Lisa Hope Pelled
-
Nov 05 Tue
-
This is a student requested topic that is actually one of my favorites. Rowe et al. provide some key terms; and Irene explains more fully some important concepts.
-
Mary Rowe, Nils Fonstad, Robert McKersie
-
Irene Kim
-
Due: Experiential Analysis
-
Nov 08 Fri
-
When we communicate within an organization, we are often trafficking in things like data, information, and knowledge. The Wikipedia article shows there are many ways of thinking about this and Nonaka is a famous scholar of how organizations can best make use of their members' knowledge.
-
Wikipedia
-
Ikujiro Nonaka
-
Nov 12 Tue
-
Kathie L. Pelletier
-
Leader toxicity: An empirical investigation of toxic behavior and rhetoric
-
j=Leadership d=2010 v=6 pp=373 doi=10.1177/1742715010379308
-
Nov 15 Fri
-
In this article you will find an uncharitable characterization of the Millennials, so brace yourself. Yet it does show that the cultural tone of an organization is affected by more than just the leaders, be they effective or "toxic."
-
Susan D. Baker, Debra R. Comer, M. Linda Martinak
-
All I’m askin’ is for a little respect: How can we promote civility in our classrooms?
-
d=2008 j=Organization Management Journal v=5 n=2 doi=10.1057/omj.2008.8
-
Nov 19 Tue
-
Patricia M. Sias, Renee G. Heath, Tara Perry, Deborah Silva, Bryan Fix
-
Narratives of workplace friendship deterioration
-
j=Journal of Social and Personal Relationships y=2004 v=21 n=321 doi=10.1177/0265407504042835
-
Kathleen Riach, Fiona Wilson
-
Don’t screw the crew: Exploring the rules of engagement in organizational romance
-
j=British Journal of Management v=18 pp=79–92 d=2007 doi=10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00503.x
-
Nov 22 Fri
-
This humorless article none-the-less provides a framework upon which we can build. In particular, when you read ask yourself if you could come up with better definitions or good examples.
-
Eric J. Romero, Kevin W. Cruthirds
-
Nov 26 Tue
-
This paper allows us to revisit the organizational theory of sense-making, which we only touched upon in the first half of the semester. When you read, note connections with previous concepts encountered, even if the authors use different terms for those concepts.
-
Sarah N. Heiss, Heather J. Carmack
-
Knock, knock; Who’s there? Making sense of organizational entrance through humor
-
j=Management Communication Quarterly d=20110801 doi=10.1177/0893318911414914
-
Due: Case analysis
-
Nov 29 Fri
-
Dec 03 Tue
-
As your final response, please send four questions, three multiple choice or fill in the blank and one short/long question.
-
Exam review
-
Due: Reading responses file
-
Dec 09 Mon
-
Exam day (1-3 PM) Forsyth Building 202