Last week I had an interesting conversation with Noam Cohen from the NYT about Wikipedia vs. The Small Screen.

Some Internet specialists argue that Wikipedia …

There are comments.

Recently, some have claimed that the English Wikipedia was “segregating” female novelists.

I don’t follow the complexities of WP as closely as I once …

There are comments.

Recently I’ve spoken about my paper Free as in Sexist? in a couple of places. I was happy to return to Jerry Brito’s …

There are comments.

I’m happy to note that a pre-print of Jeff Loveland’s and my article on encyclopedic production is now available. Originally it was toll …

There are comments.

I don’t often work on quantitative projects, but since publishing Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Brittanica with Lauren Rhue I’ve come to appreciate …

There are comments.

John Wallis’ (short and accessible) thesis Destructive Editing and Habitus in the Imaginative Construction of Wikipedia challenges my perspective of Wikipedia as an actual community …

There are comments.

First Monday’s 200th issue is up (I first published there 17 years ago!) and includes “Free as in Sexist?: Free Culture and the Gender …

There are comments.

I’m pleased to announce that there’s one more way to enjoy Good Faith Collaboration. If you still like the feel of paper …

There are comments.

This fall, I’m excited to finally teach a class focused completely on Wikipedia! Come registration, interested Northeastern students should look for COMM4918.

COMM 4918 …

There are comments.

I noted in the latest Signpost a new review of Good Faith Collaboration from Jeff Loveland has appeared in the Annals of Science. Loveland is …

There are comments.