30–50% of users browse while blocking ads.
publishers around the world will lose $54 billion in ad revenue due to ad blocking in 2024, representing around 8% of total global ad spend. If not for ad-filtering tools that enable users to elect being shown only non-intrusive ads, those losses would be notably higher—about $116 billion. (Johnson 2023)
With a peer or two, define and exemplify:
Why?
. . .
Broad, un-targeted, ads are signals of quality
Statistics about performance of individual ads feeds into dangerous self-deception about the industry-wide effects of targeting. However, as the audience begins to understand targeting, the rate of ad blocking increases, the value of web ads decreases, and increasingly crappy ads drive more user demand for ad blocking. (Marti 2017)
Fortunately, better privacy tech, such as stricter treatment of third-party cookies, makes targeting more difficult and less accurate. The value of advertising across the entire medium rises, it’s harder for ad networks to “snatch” audience from high-reputation sites, and those sites will be able to get more ad revenue and control, at the expense of middlemen. (Marti 2017)
What dilemma did we learn about that describes these situations?
. . .
Tragedy of Commons or Prisoners’ Dilemma
Let’s listen to the clip and take note of pros vs. cons on ad blocking; you will be participating in your own debate.
Google served scam ads for Amazon in 2018 and GIMP.org in 2022.
Write down how you are going to engage with ads from now on. What will be the consequences for you and content creators?