Street Epistemology method

Let’s try it ourselves

We brainstorm 4 claims about which there is disagreement.
- e.g., “1. Global warming is not caused by humans.”
Pick a number between 1..4.
I randomly renumber the statements.
For your chosen number, do you agree with the statement?

Raena has her experiences and feelings.

But, can we collectively find what is true and real?

There’s evidence, but it’s internal, … so it might not be objectively true. Raena is willing to reconsider.

But, does a belief we can’t communicate have utility?

If a belief that can’t be shown to be incorrect, how do really know and share that it’s true?

For Raena, it helps her feel unity with others.

I like this because
- it’s a thoughtful/constructive alternative to arguing;
- my beliefs should be open to (re)consideration;
- I should be willing to change my mind.
Do you think
- this was interesting, boring, offensive? Why?
- Raena would still rate the strength of her belief and confidence as 7s?
- there are other beliefs that encourage unity that people can actually share? Should we use those instead?