Affective commitment

Joseph Reagle

Commitment

  1. Affective Commitment (feelings of attachment to members/group; want)
    • identity-based & bonds-based
  2. Normative commitment (obligation to the community to act on its behalf; should)
    • to the cause (e.g., FLOSS)
    • others’ normative commitment (e.g., testimonials)
    • reciprocity (e.g., “paying it forward”)
  3. Needs based (people stay committed as long as they continue to benefit in some instrumental way; need)

Focusing on #1 today.

Affective Commitment: Wanting to Stay

Affective commitment

… based on feelings of closeness and attachment to members or group (Kraut et al. 2012, “Building successful online communities”, p. 78)

Identity vs Bond

Identity-based affective commitment is a feeling of being part of the community and helping to fulfill its mission. In contrast, bond-based affective commitment is feeling close to individual members of the group. (Kraut et al. 2012, “Building successful online communities”, p. 79)

which is User:Imzadi1979?

Exercise

ex. Document design criteria

in three groups, for each claim, suggest (1) a research method for testing it, or (2) find an insight, tip, or example (you can bundle similar criteria)

  1. Identity-based commitment (1-12)
  2. Bonds-based commitment (13-21)
  3. Preserving commitment (22-26)

Identity-based commitment (IBC)

Effects of IBC

  1. leads people to continue … in the face of membership turnover
  2. makes people more compliant with norms than does bond-based commitment

Enhancing IBC 1

  1. recruit or cluster … into homogeneous groups
  2. provide a name or tag for a common group
  3. … or identify shared interests
  4. named subgroups increase members’ commitment to the subgroups …
  5. and to the larger community as long as subgroup identity is not in conflict

randomly labeling a group [of strangers] with an arbitrary label (“over-estimators” or “under-estimators”) could activate a common identity (Kraut et al. 2012, “Building successful online communities”, p. 82)

Enhancing IBC 2

  1. make community fate, goals, or purpose explicit
  2. provide interdependent tasks to reduce conflict among subgroups
  3. highlight an out-group (and compete with it)
  4. emphasize a threat to the group, especially from an external source… but may alienate peripheral members
  5. make group members anonymous to foster identity-based commitment

Bonds-based commitment (BBC)

Enhancing BBC 1

  1. recruit existing social ties to community members
  2. facilitate interaction with “friends of friends”
  3. display photos and info about individuals
  4. encourage personal conversation
  5. places, spaces, groups, friend feeds, etc. encourages repeat interactions
  6. personalized profiles increases self-disclosure and interpersonal relations

Self-disclosure – the exchange of personally reviewing information – is both a cause and a consequence of interpersonal attraction. (Kraut et al. 2012, “Building successful online communities”, p. 94)

Enhancing BBC 2

  1. pseudonyms increase self-disclosure and interpersonal liking in sensitive contexts
  2. active self-disclosure with visible response
  3. highlighting interpersonal similarity fosters closeness

Preserving commitment

Preserving commitment

  1. community conversations don’t scale well without clustering
  2. diversity of members’ interest can alienate, especially those with IBC
  3. going off-topic can reduce IBC and increases BBC
  4. going off-topic together can increase BBC and IBC
  5. personalized filters help with above

Reading the Comments

The loss of commitment

  • What is Dunbar’s law?
  • Why do people move to new social networks?
    • Intimate serendipity vs filtered sludge?
  • Will there ever be a new social platform as large as Instagram, Facebook, or Twitter?

QICs go around

Questions?

Review

Identity & bond