Reasoned Arguments

Joseph Reagle

Our question(s)

Rhetoric and argument

Argument?

. . .

[an] argument is a claim or series of claims supported by evidence through reasoning

reasoning refers to the ability to make an inference or a judgment based on evidence (Gunn 2017, loc. 463)

Logic

logic refers to the structure of reasoning (Gunn 2017, loc. 463)

Types of Reasoning

Deductive


Many everyday arguments leave premises unsaid (enthymeme)

Syllogism: formal deduction

an argument that consists of a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion drawn from those premises (Gunn 2017, loc. 467)

Major premise: “All men are mortal.”
Minor premise: “Socrates is a man.”
∴ Conclusion: “Therefore, Socrates is mortal.”

Induction

Abduction

Induction & abduction

Analogical

Quiz: deductive, inductive, abductive, analogical

  1. Training a cat is like training a dog, requiring patience and positive reinforcement.
  2. All birds have feathers. Penguins are birds. Therefore, penguins have feathers.
  3. The sun has always risen in the east every morning. Therefore, it will do so tomorrow.
  4. The ground is wet. Therefore, it must have rained.
  1. Analogical

  2. Deductive

  3. Inductive

  4. Abductive

Toulmin model

Stephen Toulmin provides a model for understanding practical (every day) arguments based on analyzing legal cases.

Toulmin model

In six parts

  1. claims
    • “thesis” is the main claim
    • types: fact, value, and policy
  2. ground (fact, evidence, data) that supports the claim
  3. warrant (that connects the ground to the claim)
  4. backing (that the warrant applies to the claim )
  5. rebuttal (legitimate restrictions on claim)
  6. qualifier (degree of uncertainty)

(Gunn focused on 1 – 3)

“Warrant”

Warrant is an odd choice of word, so remember:

Connecting the claim and the ground

  1. you claim “dogs are great pets”
  2. you ground your claim with evidence that dogs are intelligent, obedient, and loving
    • have you shown they are great pets? not yet
  3. you warrant that great pets are perceptive, easily trained, and affectionate, which maps to dogs’ attributes
    • this connects the claim with the evidence
    • intelligent, obedient, loving ↔︎ perceptive, trainable, affectionate

Types of claims

facts
something happened, is happening, or will happen
e.g., digital tech aids learning
values
something is good or bad
e.g., digital competency is an important skill
policy
something should (not) change, happen, or be done
e.g., digital tech should be used K12 (Gunn 2017, loc. 471)

e.g., types of claims

“I should not have eaten that foot-long submarine sandwich because it made me sick. Stormycloud Subs should not sell sandwiches that large.”

ex. Dr. Essid’s case Part 1

A promising strategy for reducing increasing obesity rates, already adopted by seven states, is to deter consumers from purchasing unhealthy foods through a tax on soda or sugary drinks and junk food (Lohman, 2002). Americans today are consuming almost 20% more calories than they did in the early 1980s, and those calories are coming from increasingly less-healthy sources, mainly high-fat and high-sugar processed foods (USDA, 2002). Furthermore, processed foods and drinks are increasingly more affordable than the fruits, vegetables, and whole grains needed to sustain a healthy diet (Marsh, 2011). Assuming that cost is a more pertinent factor of food choice than personal taste, increasing the price of soda and junk food through taxes, while using that revenue to subsidize unprocessed fruits and vegetables would entice consumers to choose healthier products as they become more affordable than their unhealthy counterparts.

Part 2

There is evidence to suggest that cost, more so than preference, influences purchasing choices. A year after New York increased cigarette taxes from $1.25 to $2.75, smoking rates dropped by 12% to a historic low (Harutyunyan, 2009). Although some might argue that smoking is more of a lifestyle choice than eating, it is rather the choice of what foods to eat that will hopefully be affected in the long run.

Additionally, this tax might hurt those in areas with little access to fresh produce and whole grains, such as in low-income urban areas; therefore the “junk food tax” would only work if healthy food choices are made not only affordable but easily available to low-income consumers through the use of subsidies (Marsh, 2011). However, if precautions are taken to ensure equal access to healthy food among all citizens, then using the “carrot” of subsidized healthy food and nutrition education along with the “stick” of a food tax, the typical American diet can– and should– be changed for the better.

Can you identify??

  1. Claim(s)
  2. Evidence
  3. Warrant
  4. Backing for the warrant
  5. Rebuttal of possible counterarguments
  6. Qualification of claim

1. Claim?

. . .

A junk food tax has a good chance of being successful and should be implemented.

2. Evidence?

. . .

Statistics about food consumption highlight the need for a program encouraging healthy food consumption.

Evidence is specific to the claim (i.e., junk food consumption; not, yet, smoking cessation).

3. Warrant?

. . .

Customers make purchasing decisions largely based on cost.

4. Backing for the warrant?

A year after New York increased cigarette taxes from $1.25 to $2.75, smoking rates dropped by 12% to a historic low.

5. Rebut counterarguments?

. . .

6. Qualification of claim?

. . .

“if precautions are taken to ensure equal access to healthy food among all citizens, then…”

Fallacies

Bad vegetables?

Ad Hominem

an argument that diverts an audience away from an issue to a person, or that unfairly suggests someone’s character is to blame for a problem (Gunn 2017, loc. 479–482)

example?

. . .

“Ayn Rand was a cruel and insensitive person; therefore, you should not believe in her philosophy of objectivism.”

False cause

A correlation is used to imply causation.

example?

. . .

Dinosaurs ate vegetables and went extinct; eating vegetables will kill us.

Ad Populum (“To the People”)

an appeal to popular feelings or commonly held emotions about a claim or an assertion that is not supported by good evidence (Gunn 2017, loc. 479–482)

example?

. . .

“Four out of five dentists would recommend chewing Cheesit gum!”

(also “appeal to authority” fallacy)

Either-Or Fallacy / False dichotomy

a speaker claims that you have only two choices in making a decision, when there may in fact be many other choices (Gunn 2017, loc. 479–482)

example?

. . .

You can continue as you were or give up.

Non Sequitur

a conclusion that does not logically follow from one or more premises. (Gunn 2017, loc. 479–482)

example?

. . .

“All people are mortal; Socrates is a person; therefore, Socrates cannot dance.”

Begging the question

Circular reasoning wherein an argument’s premises assume the truth of the conclusion instead of supporting it. (Also known as “assuming the conclusion.”)

example?

. . .

Ghosts exist because I saw a ghost in the closet.

Red-Herring

a statement that is distracting and actually has no relevance to the issue under discussion; a red herring misdirects the attention of the audience (Gunn 2017, loc. 479–482)

example?

. . .

“If eating deep fried ice cream is wrong, I don’t want to be right!” (Gunn 2017, loc. 479–482)

Slippery Slope

something bad or undesirable will inevitably happen under a debated proposal

example?

. . .

“If you eat just one fast-food hamburger, you will get addicted and find yourself eating nothing but fast-food hamburgers.” (Gunn 2017, loc. 479–482)

Straw-man

When you oversimplify an opponent’s argument, or when you claim that your opponent argued something that she or he didn’t, you commit the … straw-man fallacy. (Gunn 2017, loc. 479–482)

example?

. . .

“We can get rid of all street parking for bike lanes, what of shop owners and the elderly?”

(No one said all street parking should be eliminated.)

Conclusion

Wrap up

Find a “live” example of a fallacy on the web.

Review

Which fallacy?

Google “Recognizing Fallacies Exercises”, review their fallacy, and complete quiz.

Credits

The Toulmin exercise is adapted from Joe Essid, University of Richmon via Creative Commons licensing.