We will discuss:
Which super-power would you choose?


Trolls are provocateurs: they provoke others, especially newcomers, with outlandish statements that may be insincere. They are often in it for the “lolz” or laughs.
Haters are hostile: they attack others, often by seizing upon something likely to cause distress (e.g., gender, ethnicity, sexuality, and appearance). They intend to harm and belittle others.
Or, what’s the latest in pop culture?
“I’m at home, with the doors locked, terrified.”
It began just over four weeks ago, when something shifted. It started with death threat blog comments left here (which some of you may have seen before I deleted them) including: “Comment: fuck off you boring slut… [sexualized threat of murder]” (Sierra 2007).
Keeping it simple

Kathy Sierra is a hopeless dipshit. (Locke 2007)



lost individuality & inhibitions in social context
reorient to more salient norms
(Started as __________________________________________________________(ReicherSpearsPostmes 1995))
If the situation creates evil, how does this apply to the Internet and what can we do?
Schoolchildren reveal a relationships between moral disengagement and aggressive behavior.
Boys are found to partake in this behavior more so than girls. (BanduraEtal 1996)
What are its attributes?
Mnemonic: bullies see ReD and get MaD
Kathy hollers like a stuck pig as she wonders why the trolls escalated to magnitudes which she could no longer control. The answer is obvious: she fought the LOL. The LOL won – Andrew Auernheimer (weev 2007)
Of all personality measures, sadism showed the most robust associations with trolling and, importantly, the relationship was specific to trolling behavior. (BuckelsTrapnellPaulhus 2014)

an attack by a spectrum of people exhibiting varied behavior, but who share a target, culture, and venues. (Reagle 2015)
- social
- reciprocal
- performed for and magnified by an online audience
Readers or authors?
What went wrong?
Is it enough?