Wikipedia 10K Redux by Reagle from Starling archive. Bugs abound!!!
''This categorization doesn't make any sense. Either AnarchoCapitalism and CapitalisM belong together or BolshevisM and TraditionalAnarchism belong apart. A good sign that something is wrong is that so many traditional things, like RepublicanisM, are left homeless. Any ideas for fixes?'' '''Here's an idea, which might not be the most useful one. We could arrange the ideologies alphabetically, under the assumption that attempting to group or relate them on a global page raises more questions than it answers. --JimboWales''' ---- First of all, to spare our nerves, please refrain from exaggeration: yes, the categorization does make some sense, but maybe not perfect sense. And maybe there are better categorizations. Can you do better? The only serious problem that I saw when I put the categorization up is that capitalism is espoused both by libertarian ideologies and by right-wing ideologies; in fact, that's what they have in common. One might make a supercategory CapitalistIdeologies, but the problem then is that fascism is left out (fascism never was capitalistic by any reasonable definition of capitalism). I guess the solution is simply to put "capitalism" under both headings (which I will do right now!). By the way, Jimbo's suggestion is very tempting, except that this is, after all, the only serious problem that I could see with the categorization scheme. I think it's ''nice'' to put order on the world when possible and when helpful to a degree. ---- The problem with the categorization scheme is it throws the whole economic left in together and splits up the economic right: Socialist Capitalist +------------------------ High gov | Left Right Low gov | Left Libertarian One or the other should be changed. Either libertarianism should go back in with the economic right, which makes it easy to handle the position of capitalism; or all four corners of the square (~LP diamond) should be separated, i.e. anarchism or stalinism should be removed therefrom. I'm not sure what the corners get named, though; left and right seem to me to cover sides rather than corners (see elsewhere) and I don't know the name for right-high-government. This probably seems like I'm being ridiculously difficult to work with, but I really do want wikipedia to be fair. Awarding special status to groups just because they claim it is silly, and not very objective. -- JoshuaGrosse