My Photo

About

  • About me

  • Chairman, President & Co-founder of Socialtext, the first wiki company and leading provider of Enterprise 2.0 solutions,

Dandelife


February 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29  

« Stickers are the new Business Card | Main | Bubblop »

Long-armed Law of the Wiki

I'm just an amateur, but it seems to me that Mike Langberg is afraid of loosing his job.  Can't blame him, The Mercury News just went through a round of layoffs and print media economics are in shambles.  But one of my favorite local columnists took the easy way out when buying into Nick Carr's argument on the amorality of Web 2.0 with a column called An Internet fed mostly by amateurs is frightening.

Oh, wait, I am a pro, at least about one thing -- wikis.  So I guess I have to speak up about this:

Carr added some perspective last week by proposing what he called the Law of the Wiki: ``Output quality declines as the number of contributors increases. Making matters worse, the best contributors will tend to become more and more alienated as they watch their work get mucked up by the knuckleheads, and they'll eventually stop contributing altogether, leading to a further fall in quality.''

Wrong.

I'm very much on Carr's side of the fence. I don't want to read blogs by political extremists, listen to podcasts recorded by droning amateurs, or watch videos produced by talentless would-be directors -- even though the Internet makes all that possible.

I want to get my news from highly skilled professionals, listen to music by the world's most brilliant performers and composers, and be entertained by big-budget Hollywood extravaganzas.

Of course, I'm biased. I make my living writing this column, and my paycheck is threatened if everyone decides freely available blogs -- even at lesser quality -- are an acceptable substitute.

Output quality increases with edits over time.  Yes, you can find one edit where it declines, but odds are the next edit will revert or improve it.  Now I don't know what quality is, but I know it when I see it, and I'm a lot better seeing it with a group.  It's not that Wikipedia is faster, it's that the community process that once wondered about quantity continues to raise the bar with quality.  Don't take Jimmy Wales' comment that two pages need improvement as a sign of systemic failure (no, I haven't talked with him about it).  Authority is another matter

See my response to Carr for more on how Wikipedia works. 

Back to being an amateur. The frickin Internet was made by amateurs.  I'm in good company.  Mike should know that, given the exposure he has in the Silicon Valley.  Or from his peers and former colleagues. Mike may be writing tongue-in-cheek, but 'Nuff said.

Carr's argument concerns me for the same reason IT Doesn't Matter did.  The claim then was that IT no longer provided competitive advantage, music to the ears of every other industry under disruption.  JSB and Hagel and others tore apart that argument, fortunately, and today those other industries are working with tech to invest in competitive advantage again.  The concern is it is an argument that will resonate with the disrupted, gaining a core constituency and create a false divide the engenders further disruption.

Case in point, let's get back to Mike's job.  If every columnist seizes on the threat of disruption that social media represents and and argues for the status quo, they will be left in it.  This can easily seep into the newsroom and when the publisher side of media relates the disruption to revenue, a core bias can set in (note that Mike more than disclosed the inherent bias -- and I have to disclaim that I wish him well and it is unfortunate I am using his single column as an example). 

Don't argue for quality, deliver it.  There will always be demand for quality.  The masses are not asses.  This isn't a broadcast degradation of news into entertainment.  Readers are becoming more savvy, not less.

Social media presents an opportunity for mainstream media to save itself -- not from blogs or people spending more time online -- but from a 20 year trend of bad economics.  If print media asserts it will stand on it's brand it will end up on the cutting room floor.  Now is the time for piloting things where the economics were the barrier before, because amateurs are here to participate.

UPDATE: Techdirt, Jeff Jarvis, Om, Mitch, Tim

View blog reactions

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/3436282

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Long-armed Law of the Wiki:

» Long-armed Law of the Wiki from Venture Chronicles
Nick Carr does have an amazing ability to inspire passionate response, I'll give him that. Link: Ross Mayfield's Weblog: Long-armed Law of the Wiki. Back to being an amateur. The frickin Internet was made by amateurs. I'm in good company. [Read More]

Comments

Example:

Estonia allowed e-voting in local election recently, somehow first time world wide. Most of professional magazines wrote the story at weekend some of them thinking the election was only Sunday. The e-voters did their decicion days before already. Blogger in Germany were one of the first to see this.

Didn't the monks said the same thing about Guttenberg's press?

And now experience:

Not more than one year I am blogging on Estonia in Germany, cause there is not much coverage about it.
I can not use things like word press, too complicated still for me.I should learn it.
Ok. I found unpublished Fotos of a WWI soldier on the Eastern Front.
I knew there is a studie about the importance of that war area for the following WWII.
The study says that there is a lack of images.
So I thought, should I give them to a prof, then it would go away for years to another hidden place, maybe some of them would be published later, somewhen. Instead, over months I have scanned and uploaded them on flickr. Now they were discovered by boingboing. The photos are spreading wordlwide, new things happend I didn´t know before: there are contacts in flickr, I´ve made some, maybe one of them was caught by surprise, so new fotos occured there about a WWII soldier, unpublished I think, I am getting request from educational institutions, archives..etc.
Not sure what will happen but result is good so far
This is what I wanted.

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Feeds


Flickroll


The 150