<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
<title type="text">Joseph Reagle</title>
<subtitle type="html"><![CDATA[
Open Communities, Media, Source, and Standards
]]></subtitle>
<id>http://reagle.org/joseph/blog/social/spiritual-photography</id>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://reagle.org/joseph/blog" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://reagle.org/joseph/blog/social/spiritual-photography?flav=atom" />


<author>
<name>Joseph Reagle</name>
<uri>http://reagle.org/joseph/blog/social/spiritual-photography</uri>
<email></email>
</author>
<rights>Copyright 2003-2010 Joseph Reagle</rights>
<generator uri="http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/" version="1.4.3 01/10/2008">
PyBlosxom http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/ 1.4.3 01/10/2008
</generator>

<updated>2004-12-14T09:57:54Z</updated>
<!-- icon?  logo?  -->

<entry>
<title type="html">Spiritual Photography</title>
<category term="" />
<id>http://reagle.org/joseph/blog/2004/12/14/spiritual-photography</id>
<updated>2004-12-14T09:57:54Z</updated>
<published>2004-12-14T09:57:54Z</published>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://reagle.org/joseph/blog/social/spiritual-photography.html" />
<content type="html">

&lt;p&gt;When I watch shows like Ghosthunters, I&apos;m struck by how enamored they are
of their infrared cameras and digital recorders. Firenze has an interesting
article on how the medium of photography was similarly, originally,
receieved.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #338800;&quot;&gt;Paul Firenze &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span
  style=&quot;color: #090f6b;&quot;&gt;Spirit photography: how early spiritualists tried
  to save religion by using science &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span
  style=&quot;color: #ff33b8;&quot;&gt;j=Skeptic v=11 n=2 y=2004 pp=70-78
   r=20041214&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

  &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #999999;&quot;&gt;An interesting review of how early
  spiritualists and scientists alike viewed the new technology of the camera
  to objectively capture the supernatural &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

  &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #166799;&quot;&gt;77 [Alfred Russel Wallace&apos;s] most
  important argument was &quot;the fact that phantasms, whether visible or
  invisible to persons present, can be and have been photographed.&quot; He rested
  his case for the truth of the apparitions by arguing that one cannot
  dispute &quot;the test of objectivity afforded by the photographic camera in the
  hands of experts and physicists of the first rank, rendering any escape
  from the conclusion simply impossible.&quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

  &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: #8b12d6;&quot;&gt;77 Nathaniel Hawthorne objected to these
  practices of capturing the supernatural: &quot;if these phenomenon have not
  humbug at the bottom, so much the worse for us. What can they indicate in a
  spiritual way, except that the soul of man is descending to a lower point
  than it has ever before reached while incarnate? We are pursuing a downward
  course in the eternal march, and thus bring ourselves into the same range
  with beings whom death, in requital of their gross and evil lives, has
  degraded below humanity! To hold intercourse with spirits of this order is
  to stoop and grovel in some element more vile than earthly dust.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
