<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>

<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
<title type="text">Joseph Reagle</title>
<subtitle type="html"><![CDATA[
Open Communities, Media, Source, and Standards
]]></subtitle>
<id>http://reagle.org/joseph/blog/career/phd/citation-paralysis</id>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://reagle.org/joseph/blog" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://reagle.org/joseph/blog/career/phd/citation-paralysis?flav=atom" />


<author>
<name>Joseph Reagle</name>
<uri>http://reagle.org/joseph/blog/career/phd/citation-paralysis</uri>
<email></email>
</author>
<rights>Copyright 2003-2010 Joseph Reagle</rights>
<generator uri="http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/" version="1.4.3 01/10/2008">
PyBlosxom http://pyblosxom.sourceforge.net/ 1.4.3 01/10/2008
</generator>

<updated>2004-02-11T21:09:18Z</updated>
<!-- icon?  logo?  -->

<entry>
<title type="html">Citation Paralysis</title>
<category term="" />
<id>http://reagle.org/joseph/blog/2004/02/11/citation-paralysis</id>
<updated>2004-02-11T21:09:18Z</updated>
<published>2004-02-11T21:09:18Z</published>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://reagle.org/joseph/blog/career/phd/citation-paralysis.html" />
<content type="html">

&lt;p&gt;Lago &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.errant.org/lago/archives/001023.html&quot;&gt;notes that
academia is ruining the Internet for him&lt;/a&gt;: upon reading an &lt;a
href=&quot;http://joi.ito.com/archives/2004/02/06/rational_ignorance.html&quot;&gt;interesting
blog entry&lt;/a&gt;, his reflex is to respond with a bibliography of all the
relevant readings that should have been done before the entry was posted.
I&apos;ve noted a similar character in my present academic training, and it grates
upon me. One of my most frequent complaints takes the form of asking,
&quot;where&apos;s the white-board?&quot; In most of my previous experiences a knowledge of
the literature was very useful. However, at some point we would gather around
a white board, define our terms, sketch a model, and thrash out a design or
understanding that we were happy with. In the social sciences, it seems, one
cannot even think without first burying one&apos;s self under a century of
literature.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A problem characteristic of the engineering field is the &quot;not invented
here&quot; syndrome: engineers are likely to resort to their own designs without
first consulting the field. Yet, I find myself wishing I had that sort of
problem again as I feel myself growing trapped in a morass of unimaginative
citation.&lt;/p&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
